Day 1 Morning Exercises
Arrays and for
Loops
// Copyright 2022 Google LLC // // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. // You may obtain a copy of the License at // // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 // // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and // limitations under the License. // ANCHOR: transpose fn transpose(matrix: [[i32; 3]; 3]) -> [[i32; 3]; 3] { // ANCHOR_END: transpose let mut result = [[0; 3]; 3]; for i in 0..3 { for j in 0..3 { result[j][i] = matrix[i][j]; } } return result; } // ANCHOR: pretty_print fn pretty_print(matrix: &[[i32; 3]; 3]) { // ANCHOR_END: pretty_print for row in matrix { println!("{row:?}"); } } // ANCHOR: tests #[test] fn test_transpose() { let matrix = [ [101, 102, 103], // [201, 202, 203], [301, 302, 303], ]; let transposed = transpose(matrix); assert_eq!( transposed, [ [101, 201, 301], // [102, 202, 302], [103, 203, 303], ] ); } // ANCHOR_END: tests // ANCHOR: main fn main() { let matrix = [ [101, 102, 103], // <-- the comment makes rustfmt add a newline [201, 202, 203], [301, 302, 303], ]; println!("matrix:"); pretty_print(&matrix); let transposed = transpose(matrix); println!("transposed:"); pretty_print(&transposed); }
Bonus question
It honestly doesn’t work so well. It might seem that we could use a slice-of-slices (&[&[i32]]
) as the input type to transpose and thus make our function handle any size of matrix. However, this quickly breaks down: the return type cannot be &[&[i32]]
since it needs to own the data you return.
You can attempt to use something like Vec<Vec<i32>>
, but this doesn’t work very well either: it’s hard to convert from Vec<Vec<i32>>
to &[&[i32]]
so now you cannot easily use pretty_print
either.
In addition, the type itself would not enforce that the child slices are of the same length, so such variable could contain an invalid matrix.